![]() |
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE “The Passion of the Christ” Having Unexpected Impact:Film and Surrounding Debate Might Be Lessening Hostility Toward JewsSAN FRANCISCO, CA, March 15, 2004 Commented Dr. Gary Tobin, President of the Institute for Jewish & Community
Research (IJCR): “While the film may have a different impact elsewhere
in the world, so far the Passion of the Christ is not producing any significant
anti-Jewish backlash. The film and perhaps even more, the discussions
about the film, are having something of a positive effect, which is good
news. Some Jewish and Christian leaders have been understandably worried
that the film might unleash a wave of hostility toward Jews and even
erode the constructive effects of Vatican II. But this does not appear
to be happening. Their concern, however, was not unfounded given the
rise of anti-Semitism around the world, and the central theme of Christ
killing in anti-Jewish prejudice.” Other findings from the survey reveal that most viewers and those familiar
with The Passion are pleased with it as artistic historical depiction: • Although 16% would have preferred that the film focus more on Christ’s life and teachings and less on the immediate events preceding the crucifixion, 62% are satisfied with the film the way it is; • Sixty-two percent said the film is true to the Gospels, but 19% think that Mel Gibson imposed his own interpretation of events that may not be accurate. Some still hold Jews of today responsible for the killing of Christ.
Last month, an ABC News PrimeTime poll, taken before the film’s
release, found eight percent of Americans agreeing that “all Jews
today bear responsibility for the death of Jesus.” In the present
survey, less than two percent agreed that, “…Jews alive
today, or Jewish institutions that exist now, should be held responsible
for the death of Christ.” Observed Sid Groeneman, a survey consultant
who worked on the IJCR poll: “There are several possible reasons
for the difference: First, the questions were not worded the same way: ‘should
be held responsible’ seems stronger -- possibly conveying that
retribution is necessary – than the wording ‘bear responsibility
for’. Second, the polls were taken at different times – the
ABC News poll, before the film’s release; the IJCR poll, 9-13 days
after the release. There was tremendous coverage of the film in the media,
and millions had a chance to see the movie, read reviews, and discuss
it with others. Some people’s opinions about Jewish responsibility
might have changed, with fewer people blaming Jews, as the IJCR poll
suggests. Both polls produce a smaller figure than many expected.” |